Absent

To all our Atheist friends,

Family matters have taken us out of town for a while so please accept my apologies for not posting for a few days.

Thank you for your comments, while I am away I can say that the next post will address (hopefully) many of your claims and questions regarding 'transitional' 'species' or whatever Atheists call such imaginary creatures.

Keith

Image: National Science Foundation

The 'Frogdog' lie.

Like the misguided princess in the story The Frog Prince, The Atheist hopes and wishes that if it kisses Darwin's 'frog' for long enough then their wish ('evidence') will magically appear. Unfortunately for the evolutheist his theory (clue is in the word 'theory') is built on the following two logical fallacies:

1. Wishful thinking
2. Lies

There has never been one kind of creature turned into another kind. Do I need to repeat such an obvious truth?

The Atheist waits and wishes (and perhaps kisses Darwin's book 'Origin Of Species) for evidence of his magical 'transitional' form , the 'frogdog' (a frog turning into a dog) while the rest of the world waits with bated breath. And all we have is silence from the Atheist. If one Atheist could show a frog fossil turning into a dog fossil then they would have a case to argue. Granted it wouldn't be a watertight case because they discount the work of the deceiver, but they would have at least something better than, well, (lets be honest) nothing. Zilch. Nada. Zip.

Remember, there is no true 'Atheist', or true 'Evolutheist' (evolution = theory), they are only those who either deny the Gospel or make up inventions against God and use their faith in Evolietion in order to justify their sin in their own minds.

So where are all the 'frogdogs'? Short answer - They don't exist, except in the mind of the Atheist.

"He who is faithful in a very little [thing] is faithful also in much, and he who is dishonest and unjust in a very little [thing] is dishonest and unjust also in much."
Luke 16:10 (Amplified Bible)

UPDATE

Anonymous said...

"Can't handle reality, eh Keith?

When called out on garbage, you just erase it. Typical 'honest' fundy.

Lying for Jesus, how noble."

Anonymous, it is not dishonest of me to follow the rules of this blog. If you hadn't resorted to profanity, cursing and insults, then your cursing/comments would not have been erased. You are welcome to comment if you can muster the minimum courtesy and decency required.

All too often the Atheist cries 'foul' when they themselves break the rules and have to answer to their own actions. Calling me a 'liar' for moderating my own blog exactly how I have stated is dishonest of you. And that is the reality. I wanted to give Atheist the benefit of the doubt and not have to moderate comments. We shall see how many more of you wish to call Jesus names and fling insults in place of mature dialogue? Let us hope our friend 'Anonymous' is the exception rather than the rule.

Keith