One thing that we Christians know is that 'transitional' is one of those words used all the time by atheistic evolietionists. In line with their situational and relativistical 'morals' and 'ethics' atheists also abuse science by inserting imaginary mumbo-jumbo into the lexicon of biology.
This is unintentionally hilarious for those of us who know the Creator's work. I am grateful every day that I do not have to try hard to ignore it, as do atheists. In their headlong rush to live unencumbered in their sins atheist even forget their own religious beliefs :
'Everything Came From Nothing By Accident' and 'If You Can't See It, Then It Doesn't Exist'.
Whoops.
Let us review one of these imaginary creatures so beloved by God-haters. Here they operate from The University of Chicago with this gigantic alligator-shaped lie:
"In 2006, a team of scientists unveiled the discovery of Tiktaalik roseae, a fossil fish known as the 'fishapod' "
Uh huh? Let us examine that. They found the fossil of a fish so decided to call it a 'fishapod' ?
http://tiktaalik.uchicago.edu/
Not content with finding a fossil of a fish, the atheists/evolietionists of course clamored to hail yet another 'Missing Link' (TM) (lol, how many 'The Missing Links' shall we see (read 'not see') until they finally give up?!!) and label it something else altogether. Hmmm, what could they dream up?
The 'Fishapod'! What next, it's our 'cousin' or somesuch?? lol.
George Lucas could make a film using these guys! Oh look, a Fishapod, must be one of Richard Dawkin's Alien Seeders (TM) sending out a landing party!! We can at least see the funny side of their imaginations.
But seriously, can someone please tell me how old mudskipper bones all of a sudden became 'proof' of:
1. 'when the very first fish ventured out onto land'.
2. '375 million years ago'
http://tiktaalik.uchicago.edu/meetTik.html
I rest my case. No-one was there thousands of years ago to see this mudskipper so no atheist can be taken seriously when they start calling mudskippers 'fishapods' or 'fishfrogs' that 'perhaps' 'crawled' out of the water but were previously fish kinds? LIES people. Plain lies. Mudskippers aren't frogs and they aren't dogs. They are a 'kind'. There are NO LINKS between kinds. There weren't when Darwin was alive, and there aren't today. No matter how many atheists go 'waaaaaah', this fact is not changing. Sorry.
Atheists claim to know about things they have never seen, yet they deny the One thing that is all around them (Creation) and they deny The One who can save them (Jesus).
Genesis 6:18 "Of the birds according to their kinds, and of the animals according to their kinds, of every creeping thing of the ground according to its kind, two of every sort shall come in to you, to keep them alive."
Illustration copyright © 2010 Lyle Tamarind
